Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Social Network Connections
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Summer isn't smart?
Now don't get me wrong, I saw "The Other Guys" (and considered walking out) and "Sex and the City 2" (out of pure respect for the series, which I recently watched from beginning to end). I bought in to the summer madness, the rainy nights that needed to be filled with something other than sitting at home, staring at my Facebook feed. There is a place for the "Transformers" of the world. But when that movie, the over-hyped, star-studded, action-packed thriller/comedy/shoot 'em up, becomes every movie released that summer (disguised as a children's movie, a Nicholas Sparks movie, what have you), it tires even the most mindless of middle-America. How in the world, looking at the fare we've been offered this summer at the movies, could studios be baffled at why no one went to the show? Or, when "Inception" - which was star-studded and quite the shoot 'em up, by the way - topped the box office? It was well acted, smart and really needed repeat viewings for many to be understood.
What baffles me is that if that formula - or lack thereof, thank you Mr. Nolan - worked, maybe some of those award season-caliber films should be released in the summer. Afterall, if it's an award you're after, look to this year's statue winner: A summer movie with substance, "The Hurt Locker."
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Ah, the family vacation.
Monday, May 31, 2010
More Spoleto
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Glee and Gaga
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Only one "Idol" left for me
Idina's Lea's Momma
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Glee update
Glee (April 27, 2010)
Monday, April 26, 2010
Mmmbop
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Tender TV
Saturday, April 17, 2010
"Death at a Funeral"
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Back with "Glee"
Lambert and "Idol" together again
"Little Secrets"
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Read me at Syracuse.com
Monday, January 11, 2010
"Nine" Review, in brief
“Nine” has all the sex appeal money can buy. Penelope Cruz, clad in lacy lingerie, stretches her long legs over her head; Fergie howls and growls while she rolls around on the beach wearing little more than a shawl; even Dame Judi Dench squeezes into a corset.
But “Nine” loses the depth of the Maury Yeston, Arthur Kopit musical on which the movie is based by using famous faces – and bodies – instead of capable voices.
While Daniel Day-Lewis gives a passionate performance as Guido Contini, a filmmaker and philanderer with a bad case of writer’s block, he speak-sings through the score’s difficult moments, whispering the anguished high notes in “I Can’t Make This Movie” and shortening held notes, an interruption to Yeston’s melody lines. As Guido’s mistress Carla, Cruz delivers “A Call from the Vatican” using similar disappointing techniques, though her recording includes a dazzling high C, which only the sound mixers know the authenticity of.
Still, at least their songs are integral to the story of a man fighting for his craft and his women. Kate Hudson, playing a Vogue writer and Contini fan, sings the bossa nova-style “Cinema Italiano,” a song created just for the movie. In addition to sounding like a karaoke performance, the song has no bearing on the plot. Another new song, the burlesque number “Take It All” performed by Guido’s wife Louisa, played by Marion Cotillard, feels weak. It replaces the stage show’s “Be on Your Own,” a powerful declaration that Louisa is finally leaving Guido. “Be on Your Own” frees Louisa from marriage; “Take It All” frees her from clothing.
Only Fergie’s gritty version of “Be Italian,” her voice full and lusty, burns with the passion of which she sings – and her over-the-shoulder glances during the song’s tambourine dance are smoldering. She combines the name-recognition, talent and sex appeal producers obviously felt they needed to sell the movie. But, if all the material had the strength of “Be Italian,” she and Day-Lewis could have done that without Cruz, Cotillard or – especially – Hudson.
Friday, January 8, 2010
Tim Burton at MoMA
From Edward Scissorhands to Jack Skellington, the characters in many of Tim Burton’s films reflect the alienation he felt as a child in suburban Burbank, California. The Burton exhibit on display at the Museum of Modern Art echoes this sense of isolation through its content – one set of drawings is titled “Little Dead Riding Hood”– and in its placement in the same building as Monet.
Red-and-white-striped monsters created by a film director that does not consider himself an artist by trade may seem out of place in MoMA. But Burton’s skill in several media – an oil painting of a wolf howling at the moon recalls the swirls of “Starry Night” and detail-oriented pencil drawings of the Martian brain look more like finished pieces than sketches – should convince visitors otherwise.
Unfortunately, curators Ron Magliozzi, Jenny He and Rajendra Roy undermine the respect a MoMA exhibit demonstrates with poor organization of the artwork. Burton’s work seems, at first, to be divided chronologically, though there is little direction for visitors looking for progression in his work. Placards with years and descriptors about the mostly untitled works, correspond only haphazardly to where the pieces actually hung on the wall, and the full walls overwhelm instead of welcome.
After several walls of morbidly funny drawings with hand-written captions like “Whipping a cow for whipped cream,” another room changes the exhibit’s focus from Burton, the artist to Burton, Hollywood phenomenon. A platform displaying movie props, like the white sweater from “Ed Wood,” is essential for Burton’s cult following, as are the sketches of characters from “Batman,” “Sweeney Todd” and others that hang on the surrounding walls. However, the awe they inspire diminishes the disclosure of Burton’s never-before-seen art – and the creations of the lonely boy from Burbank continue being ignored.